PH

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

Updated Jul 27, 2026

Industrials · Specialty Industrial Machinery · United States · Stock

61.7Medium RiskResearch Candidate

Score Breakdown

Scored for Dividend Income profile

Growth10.0 / 20
Profitability16.0 / 20
Financial Health14.0 / 20
Fundamental Momentum12.0 / 20
Dividend Safety16.2 / 20
Theme Exposure0.0 / 20
Model Score61.7 / 100

Sub-scores are 0–20 each; Model Score is weighted by your selected investment goal. How it works →

Why Ranked Here

  • The dividend sub-score of 16.2/20 is among the stronger dividend profiles in the industrials sector within this model, anchored by a demonstrated streak of DPS growth, FCF coverage, and a sustainable payout ratio as evidenced in the FY 2025 10-K filing.
  • The profitability sub-score of 16.0/20 reflects Parker-Hannifin's ability to sustain high operating and net margins across its Aerospace Systems and Industrial segments, which is a durable competitive characteristic grounded in its engineered-component moat.
  • The overall score of 61.7/100 positions Parker-Hannifin as a research candidate rather than a high-conviction pick because while income and profitability metrics are genuinely strong, the growth, financial health, and theme sub-scores collectively pull the composite below the threshold needed for a higher research label.

Why Not Higher

  • The theme sub-score of 0.0/20 is the single largest scoring gap in the model — had Parker-Hannifin's filing data mapped to even two macro themes, the composite score would have increased materially, likely pushing the total past 70/100.
  • The growth sub-score of 10.0/20 indicates that YoY revenue and earnings growth rates captured in the FY 2025 10-K are not at a level that justifies a higher overall score, suggesting that post-Meggitt integration has not yet produced a step-change in top-line growth velocity visible in annual filing data.

Data Confidence

10 / 10

Very High — full data coverage

Research Summary

AI-generated analysis reflects data and conditions as of the report date shown above. Verify any specific figures through primary sources before acting on this analysis.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation is a global leader in motion and control technologies, designing and manufacturing precision-engineered components and systems for aerospace, industrial, and defense applications. Its product portfolio spans hydraulics, pneumatics, electromechanical systems, filtration, and fluid handling — making it a deeply embedded supplier across manufacturing, energy, and aerospace supply chains. The company's FY 2025 10-K filing underpins a model score of 61.7/100, reflecting genuine strengths in dividend consistency and profitability offset by moderate financial health pressures and a lack of identifiable macro theme exposure in the scoring model. The dividend sub-score of 16.2/20 and profitability sub-score of 16.0/20 are the standout contributors, signaling strong free cash flow generation and disciplined capital returns. However, the financial health sub-score of 14.0/20 points to elevated leverage — likely a residual from the large-scale acquisition of Meggitt in 2022 — which constrains the overall score and introduces balance sheet risk that researchers should monitor. The growth sub-score of 10.0/20 and theme score of 0.0/20 further cap the ceiling, suggesting that near-term organic revenue acceleration and clear macro tailwind alignment are not yet strongly evidenced in the filing data.

Plain English

Parker-Hannifin makes the complex mechanical and fluid systems that keep industrial machines, aircraft, and factories running — think hydraulic arms, filtration units, and motion controls. A score of 61.7/100 with a Medium risk rating means the model sees this as a solid but not exceptional research candidate: its dividend track record and profitability are genuinely strong, but its debt load and modest revenue growth hold the score back. It scores best for dividend-income-focused researchers rather than those seeking aggressive growth. The Medium risk label reflects real leverage on the balance sheet that could matter if economic conditions or aerospace demand soften.

Bull Case vs. Bear Case

Bull Case

  • The dividend sub-score of 16.2/20 reflects a well-covered dividend supported by strong free cash flow generation, a multi-year streak of dividend per share increases, and a healthy FCF payout ratio — making Parker-Hannifin a credible research candidate for income-oriented strategies.
  • The profitability sub-score of 16.0/20 indicates robust net and operating margins alongside solid return on assets, demonstrating that Parker-Hannifin consistently converts revenue into earnings at a level well above typical industrial machinery peers.
  • The momentum sub-score of 12.0/20 suggests quarterly improvement in revenues, earnings, or margins within the FY 2025 filing period, pointing to an operational trajectory that is moving in a positive direction even amid broader industrial-cycle uncertainty.

Bear Case

  • The financial health sub-score of 14.0/20 flags elevated leverage and interest coverage that is likely still compressed from the debt-funded Meggitt acquisition, meaning any deterioration in operating cash flow could disproportionately stress the balance sheet.
  • The growth sub-score of 10.0/20 is the second-lowest individual sub-score, indicating that year-over-year revenue, net income, and EPS growth are not meaningfully accelerating from the filing data — a concern for researchers expecting post-acquisition synergy momentum to show up more forcefully.
  • The theme sub-score of 0.0/20 means the model found no identifiable macro theme alignment in the filing data, leaving Parker-Hannifin without a near-term narrative catalyst from areas such as energy transition, AI infrastructure buildout, or reshoring manufacturing — themes that are driving premium scores elsewhere in the industrials sector.

What Could Change the Picture

Bullish Triggers

  • A meaningfully improved growth sub-score in a future filing — driven by accelerating organic revenue growth and EPS expansion above current levels — would signal that Meggitt synergies are materializing and could push the composite score closer to the 70+ range.
  • A reduction in leverage evidenced by an improved financial health sub-score, reflecting deliberate debt paydown and stronger interest coverage ratios in a subsequent 10-K filing, would meaningfully de-risk the balance sheet concern and strengthen the overall research profile.

Bearish Triggers

  • A deterioration in the dividend sub-score driven by declining free cash flow coverage — for example, if FCF payout ratios widen significantly or the DPS growth streak is interrupted — would undermine the primary research thesis for income-focused researchers.
  • A further compression in the financial health sub-score, indicating that leverage ratios have worsened or interest coverage has declined, would elevate the risk rating and potentially move the research label away from candidate status toward a cautionary profile.

Red Flags

  • The financial health sub-score of 14.0/20 combined with the growth sub-score of 10.0/20 raises a specific concern: if organic revenue growth remains subdued while debt service costs remain elevated post-Meggitt, free cash flow coverage of the dividend and debt repayment could come under pressure.
  • The theme score of 0.0/20 is a structural scoring gap — Parker-Hannifin's broad industrial exposure does not map to any of the model's macro growth themes, which may limit how the company is perceived relative to more narrowly focused industrial peers that benefit from theme-driven capital flows.

Risk Profile

Medium Risk

The Medium risk rating for Parker-Hannifin reflects a balance sheet that carries meaningful debt from large-scale acquisitions alongside a business model that is cyclically sensitive to aerospace delivery schedules and industrial capital spending — both of which can create earnings volatility that does not appear in a strong-margin steady state. It is not a high-risk profile because the dividend track record and profitability metrics are genuinely resilient, but the leverage position means downside scenarios have more balance sheet consequence than for a comparably sized peer with a cleaner capital structure.

Key Catalysts to Watch

The key catalysts to monitor in future filings are the pace of organic revenue growth and margin expansion across Parker-Hannifin's Aerospace Systems segment — where long-cycle defense and commercial aerospace demand could drive a re-rating of the growth sub-score — and the trajectory of debt reduction, which would directly improve the financial health sub-score and reduce the primary source of model-assessed risk.

This report is for educational and research purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice — always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.