TTD

The Trade Desk, Inc.

Updated Jul 17, 2026

Communication Services · Advertising Agencies · United States · Stock

50.3High RiskResearch Further

Score Breakdown

Scored for Aggressive Growth profile

Growth15.0 / 20
Profitability16.0 / 20
Financial Health8.0 / 20
Fundamental Momentum15.0 / 20
Dividend Safety0.0 / 20
Theme Exposure0.0 / 20
Model Score50.3 / 100

Sub-scores are 0–20 each; Model Score is weighted by your selected investment goal. How it works →

Why Ranked Here

  • The composite score of 50.3/100 is anchored by three solid operating sub-scores — profitability at 16.0, growth at 15.0, and momentum at 15.0 — which together account for 46 of the available 60 points across those dimensions and reflect a fundamentally healthy operating business.
  • The financial health sub-score of 8.0/20 meaningfully suppresses the total score, as it represents only 40% of the maximum available points in that category, pulling the aggregate below what the operating metrics alone would suggest.
  • The absence of any dividend or theme score contribution (both 0.0/20) means the model has no additional scoring pillars to compensate for the financial health weakness, capping the total score at its current mid-range level despite above-average operational performance.

Why Not Higher

  • The financial health sub-score of 8.0/20 is the primary ceiling constraint — a stronger balance sheet with lower leverage or higher interest coverage as reported in the filing would have directly elevated the composite score.
  • The theme sub-score of 0.0/20 represents an entirely uncaptured scoring dimension; if the model had been able to map macro theme exposures such as connected TV growth, programmatic advertising adoption, or AI-driven ad tech from the filing data, the score could have improved materially.

Data Confidence

7 / 10

High — most data fields present

Research Summary

AI-generated analysis reflects data and conditions as of the report date shown above. Verify any specific figures through primary sources before acting on this analysis.

The Trade Desk, Inc. is a technology company operating a self-service, cloud-based programmatic advertising platform that enables buyers of digital advertising — including advertising agencies, brands, and trading desks — to purchase and optimize data-driven digital advertising campaigns across a wide range of channels including display, video, audio, connected TV (CTV), and social. The company acts as the demand side of the digital advertising ecosystem, competing primarily on the quality of its data integrations, real-time bidding infrastructure, and proprietary AI-driven tools such as its Kokai platform. The Trade Desk earns revenue primarily as a percentage of the advertising spend that flows through its platform, making its top-line growth directly tied to the health of digital advertising budgets. The model assigned TTD a score of 50.3/100, reflecting a genuinely mixed fundamental profile drawn from its FY2025 10-K filing. The growth sub-score (15.0/20) and momentum sub-score (15.0/20) are the strongest contributors, indicating that The Trade Desk has demonstrated meaningful year-over-year expansion in revenue and earnings, with quarterly sequential improvements in key operating metrics. The profitability sub-score (16.0/20) is also notably strong, suggesting healthy net and operating margins and solid return on assets relative to its peer group. However, the financial health sub-score (8.0/20) acts as a meaningful drag, pointing to concerns around leverage, interest coverage ratios, or the overall balance sheet structure as reported in the filing. The dividend sub-score (0.0/20) and theme sub-score (0.0/20) contribute nothing to the total, reflecting that TTD pays no dividend and that the model did not map macro theme exposures from available filing data. The core research tradeoff for TTD is between a high-quality operating business — one that is growing, profitable, and generating improving quarterly results — and a balance sheet profile that introduces financial risk, alongside the inherent cyclicality of advertising-dependent revenue. The model's 'Research Further' label and aggressive growth goal profile alignment suggest this is a research candidate suited for investors with a high tolerance for volatility and a long-term outlook, rather than a conservative or income-oriented research context.

Plain English

The Trade Desk runs a technology platform that lets advertisers buy digital ads programmatically — think of it as a sophisticated marketplace where brands bid in real time to show you ads across streaming TV, websites, and apps. The model score of 50.3 out of 100 reflects that while the company is growing and profitable by the numbers, its balance sheet carries enough financial risk to keep the overall score in the middle range. The High risk rating means the model sees meaningful uncertainty in the financial profile — this is not a stable, defensive business, and results could swing significantly depending on advertiser spending trends. Researchers with an aggressive growth profile may find this a worthwhile candidate to dig into further, while those seeking stability or income will likely find it a poor fit.

Bull Case vs. Bear Case

Bull Case

  • The profitability sub-score of 16.0/20 indicates that The Trade Desk is generating strong net and operating margins for an advertising technology company, suggesting the platform model creates durable unit economics as spend scales through the system.
  • The growth sub-score of 15.0/20 reflects meaningful year-over-year expansion in revenue, net income, and EPS as reported in the FY2025 10-K, demonstrating that the company is converting advertiser demand into measurable top-line and bottom-line gains.
  • The momentum sub-score of 15.0/20 indicates that quarterly sequential improvements in revenue and earnings trends were evident in the filing period, suggesting the business was accelerating or at minimum sustaining its operational trajectory heading into the next fiscal year.

Bear Case

  • The financial health sub-score of 8.0/20 is the most significant weakness in the model, signaling that leverage ratios, interest coverage, or overall balance sheet construction as reported in the 10-K raise material concerns about financial resilience in a downturn.
  • The dividend and theme sub-scores both register 0.0/20, meaning the model receives no incremental support from income characteristics or identified macro theme tailwinds, leaving the total score entirely dependent on operational metrics that are inherently cyclical.
  • As a company whose revenue is directly tied to advertising budgets — which are among the first expenditures cut by brands during economic slowdowns — TTD's otherwise strong operating profile could deteriorate rapidly if macroeconomic conditions weaken and advertisers reduce programmatic spend.

What Could Change the Picture

Bullish Triggers

  • Evidence in a future 10-K filing of meaningfully reduced leverage ratios and improved interest coverage would directly raise the financial health sub-score and push the composite model score above its current 50.3 level.
  • Sustained acceleration in revenue growth or further margin expansion in subsequent quarterly filings would strengthen both the growth and momentum sub-scores, potentially lifting the composite score toward the 60+ range and improving the research candidate designation.

Bearish Triggers

  • A deterioration in quarterly revenue or earnings trends reflected in future regulatory filings — indicating a reversal of the momentum that currently scores 15.0/20 — would weaken the momentum sub-score and reduce the overall composite score.
  • A significant increase in debt levels or a reduction in operating income that impairs interest coverage as reported in a future 10-K would further depress the already-weak financial health sub-score, potentially pushing the total score below 45 and into a less favorable research profile.

Red Flags

  • The financial health sub-score of 8.0/20 is notably low relative to the company's otherwise strong profitability and growth scores, which may indicate elevated leverage or weaker-than-expected interest coverage ratios within the FY2025 10-K filing that warrant careful scrutiny.

Risk Profile

High Risk

The High risk rating reflects the combination of a structurally weak financial health sub-score (8.0/20) and the inherent revenue cyclicality of a business entirely dependent on advertiser spending decisions, which can contract sharply during economic stress without the buffer of diversified revenue streams or a conservative balance sheet. For TTD specifically, this means that while the operational metrics are strong, the financial structure as reported in the FY2025 10-K leaves limited margin for error if top-line growth were to slow or reverse.

Key Catalysts to Watch

The key factors to monitor for TTD are continued adoption of its programmatic platform by large brand advertisers and the pace of connected TV ad spend migration, both of which would sustain or accelerate the growth and momentum sub-scores in future filings. Additionally, any balance sheet restructuring or debt reduction disclosed in future 10-K filings would be a direct catalyst for improvement in the financial health sub-score and the overall model ranking.

This report is for educational and research purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice — always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.