XOM

ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation

Updated Jul 27, 2026

Energy · Oil & Gas Integrated · United States · Stock

51.9Low RiskResearch Further

Score Breakdown

Scored for Safe Long-Term Investing profile

Growth3.5 / 20
Profitability12.0 / 20
Financial Health20.0 / 20
Fundamental Momentum9.8 / 20
Dividend Safety10.0 / 20
Theme Exposure0.0 / 20
Model Score51.9 / 100

Sub-scores are 0–20 each; Model Score is weighted by your selected investment goal. How it works →

Why Ranked Here

  • A maximum financial health sub-score of 20.0 out of 20 provides a strong foundation for the composite score, anchoring XOM above many peers in leverage and balance sheet quality as derived from EDGAR filings.
  • The dividend sub-score of 10.0 and profitability sub-score of 12.0 together contribute 22 points to the composite, reflecting real cash generation and above-average margin performance that prevent the score from falling lower.
  • The growth sub-score of 3.5 and theme score of 0.0 collectively suppress the composite by roughly 32.5 points relative to what a maximum score would require, explaining why an otherwise financially sound company lands at 51.9 rather than in the 70s or 80s.

Why Not Higher

  • The theme sub-score of 0.0 out of 20 is a structural ceiling-lowering factor — XOM does not qualify for any of the macro theme exposures tracked by the model, meaning it cannot access up to 20 additional composite points available to thematically-aligned companies.
  • The growth sub-score of 3.5 out of 20 signals that the FY 2025 filing showed limited year-over-year expansion in revenues, net income, and earnings per share, which is one of the model's most heavily weighted dimensions for identifying higher-scoring research candidates.

Data Confidence

10 / 10

Very High — full data coverage

Research Summary

AI-generated analysis reflects data and conditions as of the report date shown above. Verify any specific figures through primary sources before acting on this analysis.

ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation is one of the world's largest integrated oil and gas companies, engaged across the full energy value chain — upstream exploration and production, downstream refining, and chemicals manufacturing — with operations spanning multiple continents. As reported in its FY 2025 10-K filing with the SEC, the model assigned XOM a score of 51.9/100, reflecting a company that exhibits genuinely strong financial health and a well-supported dividend profile, but is weighed down by subdued growth metrics and a lack of exposure to high-conviction macro themes currently tracked by the scoring model. The financial health sub-score of 20.0 out of 20 signals an exceptionally well-capitalized balance sheet with manageable leverage and robust interest coverage, while the dividend sub-score of 10.0 out of 20 reflects a meaningful free cash flow-backed payout with a multi-year streak of dividend-per-share growth. However, the growth sub-score of just 3.5 out of 20 indicates that year-over-year revenue, net income, and EPS growth were limited in the most recent filing period, and the momentum sub-score of 9.8 suggests only modest sequential improvement in revenues or margins across quarters. The theme score of 0.0 out of 20 further suppresses the total, as XOM does not register exposure to any of the macro themes tracked by the model in its current configuration. The core research tradeoff for XOM is between balance sheet resilience and income stability on one hand, and weak near-term growth dynamics and absent thematic tailwinds on the other. The model's best-fit profile is safe long-term investing, where XOM scores 61.7, underscoring its suitability for researchers focused on capital preservation and steady income generation rather than earnings acceleration. By contrast, the aggressive growth profile score of 38.2 confirms this is not a research candidate associated with rapid expansion.

Plain English

ExxonMobil is a massive American oil and gas company that drills for oil, refines it into fuel, and makes chemicals — it does all of it under one roof. The model score of 51.9 out of 100 says it's a solid but not exciting company: it has one of the strongest balance sheets in the model's dataset, pays a well-covered dividend, but isn't growing its revenues or earnings much right now. The Low risk rating reflects that XOM carries manageable debt and strong interest coverage based on its SEC filing data, meaning it looks financially stable rather than fragile. If you're researching companies for steady, long-term income and stability rather than fast growth, the model flags XOM as worth researching further.

Bull Case vs. Bear Case

Bull Case

  • The financial health sub-score of 20.0 out of 20 — the maximum possible — indicates that XOM's balance sheet, leverage ratios, and interest coverage are among the strongest captured in the model's EDGAR-derived dataset, reducing financial distress risk.
  • The dividend sub-score of 10.0 out of 20 reflects a free cash flow-supported dividend payout with a documented multi-year streak of dividend-per-share growth, suggesting income consistency backed by actual cash generation rather than debt.
  • The profitability sub-score of 12.0 out of 20 indicates that XOM maintains above-average net margins, operating margins, and return on assets for an integrated energy company, supporting the sustainability of its financial model even during periods of softer topline growth.

Bear Case

  • The growth sub-score of just 3.5 out of 20 is one of the weakest components in XOM's profile, indicating that year-over-year revenue, net income, and EPS growth were materially limited in the FY 2025 filing period.
  • The momentum sub-score of 9.8 out of 20 suggests that quarterly sequential improvement in revenues, earnings, and margins was only modest, pointing to a lack of near-term earnings acceleration that would justify a higher composite score.
  • The theme sub-score of 0.0 out of 20 means XOM does not register exposure to any of the macro themes currently tracked by the scoring model, which structurally caps its composite score and limits its appeal to researchers screening for thematically-driven investment candidates.

What Could Change the Picture

Bullish Triggers

  • A material improvement in the growth sub-score — driven by accelerating year-over-year revenue and net income figures in a future 10-K filing — would be the single most impactful data change to push the composite score meaningfully above 51.9.
  • If the scoring model's theme taxonomy is updated to include energy security, LNG infrastructure, or industrial commodity exposure, XOM's operations would likely qualify for theme credit, potentially adding up to 20 points to the composite and reshaping its research profile.

Bearish Triggers

  • A deterioration in the financial health sub-score — for example, if leverage ratios increased significantly or interest coverage declined in a future SEC filing — would erode XOM's primary scoring strength and lower the composite below its current level.
  • A reduction in free cash flow coverage of the dividend, reflected in a weakening dividend sub-score in a subsequent 10-K, would undermine the income-stability thesis that currently makes XOM most suitable for the safe long-term investing profile.

Red Flags

  • The growth sub-score of 3.5 out of 20 is a materially low reading that warrants scrutiny — if revenue and net income contraction persists across future filings, it could pressure the profitability and dividend sub-scores in subsequent model cycles.

Risk Profile

Low Risk

The Low risk rating assigned to XOM is grounded in its maximum financial health sub-score of 20.0 out of 20, which reflects strong balance sheet metrics, controlled leverage, and robust interest coverage as derived directly from the FY 2025 SEC EDGAR filing. For an integrated energy company operating in a cyclical sector, this level of financial stability indicates that XOM carries meaningfully less structural financial risk than many of its industry peers captured in the model's dataset.

Key Catalysts to Watch

The key data catalyst to monitor for XOM is any change in its year-over-year revenue and net income trajectory as reported in future 10-K filings, since the growth sub-score of 3.5 is the primary drag on the composite and even a moderate improvement would have a disproportionate upward effect on the model score. Researchers should also watch for any evolution in the scoring model's macro theme definitions, as XOM's operations in integrated energy could become thematically eligible under revised criteria, unlocking the currently zeroed-out theme sub-score.

This report is for educational and research purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice — always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.