|
Technology & DigitalUpdated Jun 14, 2026

Semiconductors

81/ 100Strong
Time horizon: 5-10 yearsTailwind: Strong

Investment Thesis

Semiconductors underpin every major structural growth theme — AI compute, electric vehicles, defense systems, industrial automation, and IoT devices — creating demand across multiple end-markets simultaneously. Government subsidy programs (U.S. CHIPS Act, EU Chips Act, Japan FABS Act) are funding domestic fab expansion for the first time in decades. Geopolitical fragmentation between the U.S. and China is creating redundant supply chains that require substantially more global capacity than a single-source model ever did.

Industries Benefiting

Integrated CircuitsMemorySemiconductor EquipmentFoundry ServicesAdvanced Packaging

Theme Score Breakdown

Tailwind Strength17 / 20
Durability11 / 15
Global Need14 / 15
Policy Support15 / 15
Revenue Visibility13 / 15
Strategic Importance10 / 10
Investable Universe9 / 10
Risk Penalty-8

Semiconductors score high Strong because they are foundational to every structural growth theme and the CHIPS Act, EU Chips Act, and Japan FABS Act represent the largest coordinated industrial policy in the sector's history. Durability drops to 11 because semiconductor cycles are genuinely brutal — inventory corrections can destroy 50-70% of earnings within a single year, making the 'structural' story hard to sustain through the experience of holding through a downturn. The -8 risk penalty is the harshest in the library and reflects three compounding risks: the severity of cyclical corrections, the existential Taiwan scenario, and export control exposure that can change with a single executive order.

Key Risks

  • Cyclical demand downturns causing inventory corrections across the supply chain
  • China-Taiwan geopolitical disruption threatening TSMC production
  • End-market concentration in AI capex creating single-point-of-failure risk
  • Export control escalation disrupting cross-border equipment and IP flows

Research Candidates

Ranked by model score · 17candidates · Not financial advice

#TickerCompanyScoreRiskResearch Label
1NVDA

NVIDIA Corporation

Technology · United States

84.9Very Low RiskStrong Candidate
2MU

Micron Technology, Inc.

Technology · United States

81.3Low RiskDividend Candidate
3ASML

ASML Holding N.V.

Technology · Netherlands

78.1Low RiskDividend Candidate
4TSM

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited

Technology · Taiwan

75.2Low RiskDividend Candidate
5KLAC

KLA Corporation

Technology · United States

75.2Medium RiskStrong Candidate
6AVGO

Broadcom Inc.

Technology · United States

72.6Medium RiskResearch Candidate
7LRCX

Lam Research Corporation

Technology · United States

72.6Low RiskCore Holding Candidate
8AMAT

Applied Materials, Inc.

Technology · United States

69.8Low RiskDividend Candidate
9MRVL

Marvell Technology, Inc.

Technology · United States

69.0Medium RiskResearch Candidate
10ADI

Analog Devices, Inc.

Technology · United States

67.4Medium RiskResearch Candidate
11TXN

Texas Instruments Incorporated

Technology · United States

64.0Low RiskCore Holding Candidate
12QCOM

QUALCOMM Incorporated

Technology · United States

63.1Medium RiskResearch Candidate
13AMD

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Technology · United States

62.0Low RiskCore Holding Candidate
14NXPI

NXP Semiconductors N.V.

Technology · Netherlands

58.8Medium RiskResearch Further
15MCHP

Microchip Technology Incorporated

Technology · United States

46.2Very High RiskResearch Further
16ARM

Arm Holdings plc

Technology · United Kingdom

42.3High RiskMonitor Only
17INTC

Intel Corporation

Technology · United States

39.4High RiskMonitor Only

Precomputed research data · Data as of 2026-06-14 · Educational research only · Not financial advice